Zhang Ming: On March 5, a major traffic accident occurred outside the gate of  Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics in Nanchang in which a sedan  collided with a bus before careening off into a crowd of people,  killing two students and injuring four. Among those killed was a female  graduate student from the university. Arriving at the scene, the police  failed to follow procedure. They did not secure the scene, nor did they  test the blood alcohol content of the sedan driver.
It was only after classmates of the dead students made a stink  online, posting an account of the incident on China’s domestic  Twitter-like “microblogs,” or 
weibo, and drawing nationwide attention to the case, that the government in Nanchang decided to act.
Hours after the accident, police finally tested the driver’s alcohol  level, which still showed him over the legal limit. He was charged with  driving under the influence (酒驾), avoiding the more serious charge of  drunken driving (醉驾). But you can just imagine how the test might have  come out had police followed procedure at the scene. And without the  interference of online public opinion pressure, the driver might have  gotten off scott free.
There was more to this story than a simple procedural hiccup,  however. Why had police released the driver in the first place? Because  he is, as it turns out, the current vice-president of Jiangxi University  of Finance and Economics, Liao Weiming (廖为明).
This case is arguably more serious than 
the Li Gang incident in Hebei province,  which sparked so much anger across China in October last year after the  son of an influential police official killed a female student while  driving recklessly on the campus of Hebei University.
Fortunately, microblogs now offer us a new means of focusing  attention on cases like this one. I came across the post on this case  too, and I passed it along to my own microblog followers, doing my part  to ensure it got the attention it deserved. If it weren’t for the power  of the microblog, Vice-president Liao would have walked away from all  responsibility. But of course the underlying issue here is how the rules  can be bent in cases like this one, even over a traffic accident, to  serve the interests of the powerful.
We live in the age of the automobile in China, and we see many of our  society’s problems manifested over luxury sedans and the special powers  and privileges they have come to symbolize. No one dares lift a finger  when traffic laws are broken by the powerful. 
The violator need only  mention that he knows such-and-such a person in the traffic police  division and the whole matter is neatly smoothed over. When this is how  things really work, what good is it to announce a national campaign  against drunk driving?
In the olden days, Chinese waited for the benevolent official of myth  and fiction to come and deliver justice. Today, people wait for  microblogs to apply pressure, administering some semblance of justice.
In a sense, of course, this is a mark of progress. But why is it that  simple justice can only come if pressure from microblogs are brought to  bear? Do police in Nanchang not know how to handle a traffic accident?  That’s not it, of course. They don’t need people teaching them how to do  their jobs through microblogs. 
What microblogs do is apply public opinion pressure. And if truth be  told, the authorities in Nanchang don’t exactly live in fear of public  opinion. To the extent that online public opinion serves any purpose at  all, this is only because the superiors of those involved are keen to  manage the possible impact on their own careers. 
All of us know not every case of wrongdoing can garner the attention  in China’s microblog sphere necessary to elicit action. There are many  more cases, perhaps more tragic than this one, that may fail to heat up  for all sorts of reasons — people can’t make out what’s true or not, or  there aren’t the right elements to stir public emotion.
We cannot rely on microblogs to bring us social justice. If those  charged with upholding the law look first to upholding their own  interests, anger and injustice will continue to build up in society.